“住宿安全堪憂”
The transport is decent—step outside and you’re right by the train, and from there you can find food, sights, and a night‑market nearby, so you won’t run out of places to eat; the surroundings and the room itself were tidy, though not every room had a fridge, but the first‑floor common area did; the air‑conditioner cooled quickly, and the shower’s water spray was fine‑grained, almost like a needle’s thread. The door, however, gave me zero sense of security: the external lock required a key, yet inside the door could be opened by simply pressing the knob down; I discovered this only after checking the lock before showering. I reported it to customer service, who kept insisting that as long as the external lock was secure, it was fine. I asked how they'd handle a situation where a drunk or otherwise problematic guest from another room opened the door and caused an incident, and they didn’t answer. This isn’t about the external key, it’s about misleading information that induces panic. If a group of kids or girls were traveling together, they’d record this and show it to their parents, who would be worried. If an accident actually happened, would the hotel be liable? It’s peak season, and although I wasn’t forced to leave early, I couldn’t sleep well at night; I had to lock the door before entering, couldn’t touch the knob, and had to block a heavy object in front of the door, keeping the lights and TV on all night—yet my sleep remained fragmented. The location is behind the High Court, but the safest place is the one that lets you relax; that’s what makes it dangerous.
Tzu·2 maanden geleden